Iepirkumu uzraudz\u012bbas birojs (IUB), izskatot iesniegt\u0101s s\u016bdz\u012bbas Autotransporta direkcijas konkurs\u0101 par sabiedrisk\u0101 transporta pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anu ar autobusiem re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s noz\u012bmes mar\u0161rutu t\u012bkl\u0101, aizliedzis sl\u0113gt l\u012bgumus septi\u0146\u0101s da\u013c\u0101s jeb lot\u0113s, pav\u0113st\u012bja IUB.<\/p>\n
Biroj\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka, izskatot asto\u0146u p\u0101rvad\u0101t\u0101ju iesniegumus par Autotransporta direkcijas r\u012bkoto atkl\u0101to konkursu “Par ties\u012bbu pie\u0161\u0137ir\u0161anu sabiedrisk\u0101 transporta pakalpojumu snieg\u0161anai ar autobusiem re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s noz\u012bmes mar\u0161rutu t\u012bkl\u0101”, IUB atzinis par pamatotiem vair\u0101kus iebildumus par pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja pied\u0101v\u0101jumu v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas proces\u0101 pie\u013cautajiem p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
T\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di IUB aizliedzis sl\u0113gt iepirkuma l\u012bgumus septi\u0146\u0101s konkursa lot\u0113s, bet vien\u0101 konkursa lot\u0113 atc\u0113lis l\u0113mumu par konkursa izbeig\u0161anu bez rezult\u0101tiem, uzdodot \u0161aj\u0101s lot\u0113s veikt atk\u0101rtotu pied\u0101v\u0101jumu v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anu. Savuk\u0101rt trij\u0101s konkursa lot\u0113s IUB atst\u0101ja sp\u0113k\u0101 pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja pie\u0146emto l\u0113mumu par konkursa izbeig\u0161anu bez rezult\u0101tiem.<\/p>\n
IUB min\u0113ja, ka personu apvien\u012bba, kuru veido SIA “Gulbenes autobuss” un SIA “Balvu autotransports”, apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa ceturt\u0101s un desmit\u0101s lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja l\u0113mums ceturtaj\u0101 lot\u0113 ir nepamatots, jo nav veikta nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma p\u0101rbaude un pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js nav sniedzis objekt\u012bvu pamatojumu konkr\u0113t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma izv\u0113lei, savuk\u0101rt konkursa desmitaj\u0101 lot\u0113 personu apvien\u012bbas pied\u0101v\u0101jums nepamatoti ir atz\u012bts par neatbilsto\u0161u un noraid\u012bts.<\/p>\n
SIA “VTU Valmiera” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa 15.lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js ir pie\u013c\u0101vis p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, izv\u0113rt\u0113jot \u0161aj\u0101 lot\u0113 par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju atz\u012bt\u0101 pretendenta personu apvien\u012bbu, kuru veido SIA “Sabiedriskais autobuss” un Lietuvas “Vlasava,” pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 iek\u013cauto izmaksu pamatot\u012bbu.<\/p>\n
SIA “Norma-A” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa 10. un 13.lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jumi \u0161aj\u0101s lot\u0113s nepamatoti ir atz\u012bti par neatbilsto\u0161iem un noraid\u012bti.<\/p>\n
Personu apvien\u012bba, kuru veido SIA “Dobeles autobusu parks” un SIA “Jelgavas autobusu parks”, apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa piekt\u0101s lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js ir pie\u013c\u0101vis p\u0101rk\u0101pumus uzvar\u0113ju\u0161\u0101 pretendenta AS “Liep\u0101jas autobusu parks” pied\u0101v\u0101juma v\u0113rt\u0113\u0161an\u0101, proti, pie\u013c\u0101vis min\u0113t\u0101 pretendenta pied\u0101v\u0101juma neat\u013cautu groz\u012b\u0161anu.<\/p>\n
SIA “Tukuma auto” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa piekt\u0101s un 14.lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jums konkursa piektaj\u0101 lot\u0113 nepamatoti ir atz\u012bts par neatbilsto\u0161u un noraid\u012bts, savuk\u0101rt pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101ja l\u0113mums 14.lot\u0113 ir nepamatots, jo nav veikta nepamatoti l\u0113ta pied\u0101v\u0101juma p\u0101rbaude un pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js nav sniedzis objekt\u012bvu pamatojumu konkr\u0113t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101juma izv\u0113lei.<\/p>\n
AS “Cata” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa otr\u0101s, dev\u012bt\u0101s un 11.lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jumi \u0161aj\u0101s lot\u0113s pamatoti ir atz\u012bti par neatbilsto\u0161iem un noraid\u012bti, jo pretendents pied\u0101v\u0101ja maz\u0101ku bruto likmi darbiniekam (autobusa vad\u012bt\u0101jam) m\u0113nes\u012b par autobusa vad\u012b\u0161anas un sagatavo\u0161an\u0101s laiku, nek\u0101 bija noteicis pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js tehniskaj\u0101 specifik\u0101cij\u0101.<\/p>\n
Pa\u0161vald\u012bbas SIA “Ventspils reiss” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa 16.lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka pas\u016bt\u012bt\u0101js ir pie\u013c\u0101vis atsevi\u0161\u0137us p\u0101rk\u0101pumus, izv\u0113rt\u0113jot \u0161aj\u0101 lot\u0113 par uzvar\u0113t\u0101ju atz\u012bt\u0101 pretendenta AS “Talsu autotransports” pied\u0101v\u0101jum\u0101 iek\u013cauto izmaksu pamatot\u012bbu un sp\u0113ju iesaist\u012bt pakalpojumu snieg\u0161an\u0101 bez izme\u0161u autobusus.<\/p>\n
Savuk\u0101rt SIA “J\u0113kabpils autobusu parks” apstr\u012bd\u0113ja konkursa sest\u0101s lotes rezult\u0101tus, un IUB konstat\u0113ja, ka t\u0101 pied\u0101v\u0101jums nepamatoti ir atz\u012bts par neatbilsto\u0161u un noraid\u012bts.<\/p>\n
Jau zi\u0146ots, ka konkurs\u0101 par sabiedrisk\u0101 transporta pakalpojumu nodro\u0161in\u0101\u0161anu no 2021.gada Autotransporta direkcija izraudz\u012bj\u0101s uzvar\u0113t\u0101jus 12 mar\u0161rutu t\u012bkla da\u013c\u0101s jeb lot\u0113s no kopum\u0101 16. Tostarp lot\u0113 “Bauska” par uzvar\u0113ju tika atz\u012bta AS “Nordeka”, lot\u0113 “Daugavpils, Kr\u0101slava” – SIA “Daugavpils autobusu parks”, lot\u0113 “Gulbene, Al\u016bksne, Balvi” – apvien\u012bba AS “Nordeka” un SIA “Sabiedriskais autobuss”, lot\u0113 “Jelgava, Dobele” – AS “Liep\u0101jas autobusu parks”, lot\u0113 “Kuld\u012bga, Saldus” – SIA “Sabiedriskais autobuss”, lot\u0113 “Liep\u0101ja” – AS “Liep\u0101jas autobusu parks”, lot\u0113 “Madona” – SIA “Tukuma auto”, lot\u0113 “Pier\u012bga” – apvien\u012bba AS “Liep\u0101jas autobusu parks”, SIA “Sabiedriskais autobuss” un AS “Nordeka”, lot\u0113 “R\u0113zekne, Ludza” – AS “R\u0113zeknes autobusu parks”, lot\u0113 “Talsi, Tukums” – AS “Talsu autotransports” lot\u0113 “Talsi, Tukums”, lot\u0113 “Valmiera, Valka, Smiltene” – apvien\u012bba SIA “Sabiedriskais autobuss” un Lietuvas “Vlasava” bet lot\u0113 “Ventspils” – AS “Talsu autotransports”.<\/p>\n
Pretendenti IUB ir iesniedza 11 s\u016bdz\u012bbas par konkursa rezult\u0101tiem.<\/p>\n
Savuk\u0101rt piec\u0101s lot\u0113s, kur p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u012bbu nebija, ir nosl\u0113gti l\u012bgumi ar uzvar\u0113t\u0101jiem.<\/p>\n
Avots: tvnet.lv<\/p>\n