{"id":1650,"date":"2018-08-21T15:04:57","date_gmt":"2018-08-21T12:04:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/?p=1650"},"modified":"2018-08-21T15:04:57","modified_gmt":"2018-08-21T12:04:57","slug":"arodbiedriba-lakrs-nodrosinot-juridisko-palidzibu-uzvar-tiesa-darba-deveju-pasazieru-parvadajuma-uznemumu-as-cata-kas-nepamatoti-versas-pret-lakrs-arodbiedribas-biedru-un-autobusa-vaditaju-martinu-a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/?p=1650","title":{"rendered":"Arodbiedr\u012bba LAKRS nodro\u0161inot juridisko pal\u012bdz\u012bbu uzvar ties\u0101 darba dev\u0113ju, pasa\u017eieru p\u0101rvad\u0101juma uz\u0146\u0113mumu AS CATA, kas nepamatoti v\u0113rs\u0101s pret LAKRS arodbiedr\u012bbas biedru un autobusa vad\u012bt\u0101ju M\u0101rti\u0146u Aizpurieti"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>2017. gada 21. decembr\u012b uz\u0146\u0113mums AS \u201cCATA\u201d, nesa\u0146emot arodbiedr\u012bbas piekri\u0161anu par darbinieka un arodbiedr\u012bbas LAKRS biedra M\u0101rti\u0146a Aizpurie\u0161a darba l\u012bguma uzteikumu, v\u0113rs\u0101s ties\u0101 par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161anu. Uz\u0146\u0113mums v\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s atbr\u012bvoties no darbinieka un akt\u012bva arodbiedr\u012bbas biedra, kur\u0161 \u0101rpus darba laika bija paudis kritisku, savu person\u012bgo viedokli par darba dev\u0113ja nesp\u0113ju nodro\u0161in\u0101t darbiniekiem cien\u012bgus darba apst\u0101k\u013cus un taisn\u012bgu samaksu par padar\u012bto darbu, atbilsto\u0161i normat\u012bvo aktu pras\u012bb\u0101m, k\u0101 rezult\u0101t\u0101 b\u016btiski bija samazin\u0101jies autobusa vad\u012bt\u0101ju darba samaksas apm\u0113rs.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>K\u0101 ar\u012b pildot deput\u0101ta pien\u0101kumus Limba\u017eu novada dom\u0113 nor\u0101d\u012bja uz negat\u012bvaj\u0101m sek\u0101m, kuras rada meh\u0101niska reisu sl\u0113g\u0161ana re\u0123ionos, liedzot iedz\u012bvot\u0101jiem pieejamu sabiedrisko transportu, nok\u013c\u016b\u0161anai uz\/no re\u0123ionu centriem un darbu. Darba dev\u0113js papildus augst\u0101k min\u0113tajam ties\u0101 l\u016bdza atbr\u012bvot darbinieku ar\u012b par to, ka autobusos ievietoj\u0101s videokamer\u0101s \u0161\u0101 gada maij\u0101 bija redzami vienlaic\u012bgi vair\u0101ki iesp\u0113jams darba noteikumu p\u0101rk\u0101pumi, k\u0101 viens no tiem tika nor\u0101d\u012bts pras\u012bbas pieteikuma papildin\u0101jum\u0101, darbinieks bija p\u0101rbraucis p\u0101ri 920. Ce\u013ca apz\u012bm\u0113jumam baltajai nep\u0101rtrauktai l\u012bnijai, \u0161aj\u0101 sakar\u0101 arodbiedr\u012bba LAKRS ar\u012b nav devusi savu piekri\u0161anu, jo uzskat\u012bja, ka nav iev\u0113rota vienl\u012bdz\u012bga attieksme pret darbiniekiem, uzdodot jaut\u0101jumu \u2013 Vai pret visiem darbiniekiem tiek piem\u0113rots pats smag\u0101kais disciplin\u0101rsods \u2013 darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161ana, ja tiek p\u0101rk\u0101pts ce\u013ca satiksmes noteikums attaisnojo\u0161a iemesla d\u0113\u013c, pie tam tas nav fiks\u0113ts atbilsto\u0161i normat\u012bvo aktu pras\u012bb\u0101m?! J\u0101\u0146em v\u0113r\u0101, ka darba dev\u0113jam nav t\u0101da dele\u0123\u0113juma \u2013 p\u0101rk\u0101pumu fiks\u0113\u0161anai. K\u0101 ar\u012b b\u016btiski atz\u012bm\u0113t, ka p\u0101rbraucot p\u0101ri 920 ce\u013ca apz\u012bm\u0113juma baltajai nep\u0101rtrauktai l\u012bnijai administrat\u012bvais sods ir br\u012bdin\u0101jums vai 15 <em>euro<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Tiesa izskatot lietu p\u0113c b\u016bt\u012bbas pirmaj\u0101 tiesu instanc\u0113 konstat\u0113ja, ka uz\u0146\u0113mums CATA nepamatoti ir v\u0113rsies pret darbinieka ties\u012bb\u0101m br\u012bvi paust savu viedokli \u0101rpus darba laika un t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 liedzot arodbiedr\u012bbai pild\u012bt savas funkcijas darbinieku intere\u0161u aizst\u0101v\u0113\u0161anai. Uz\u0146\u0113mums CATA iesniedzot pras\u012bbu ties\u0101 pret LAKRS arodbiedr\u012bbas biedru, bija ne tikai p\u0101rk\u0101pis procesu\u0101los termi\u0146us darba l\u012bguma uzteik\u0161anai, bet ar\u012b nebija izv\u0113rt\u0113jis p\u0101rk\u0101puma b\u016btiskumu, un nepamatoti sod\u012bjis darbinieku ar\u012b par ce\u013cu satiksmes p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, kas neatbilst Administrat\u012bv\u0101 procesa likum\u0101 noteiktajam, ka to ir ties\u012bga tikai kompetent\u0101 instit\u016bcija izv\u0113rt\u0113jot atbild\u012bbas apm\u0113ru un smagumu \u2013 ce\u013cu policija.<\/p>\n<p>Tiesa pievienojoties ARODBIEDR\u012aBAS LAKRS viedoklim, par nepamatotu v\u0113r\u0161anos pret t\u0101s biedru M\u0101rti\u0146u Aizpurieti, piln\u012bb\u0101 noraid\u012bja AS CATA pras\u012bbu par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161anu. Protams, \u0161\u012b ir pirm\u0101 maz\u0101 uzvara, jo past\u0101v iesp\u0113ja, ka AS \u201cCATA\u201d spriedumu 20 dienu laik\u0101 p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113s.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Izvilkums no 2018.gada 17. augusta sprieduma Liet\u0101 Nr. <\/strong><strong>C2105391<em>:<\/em><\/strong> <em>\u201cTiesa atz\u012bst atbild\u0113t\u0101ja r\u012bc\u012bbu &#8211; neapst\u0101\u0161anos pieturviet\u0101 un pasa\u017eieru neuz\u0146em\u0161anu par darba l\u012bguma p\u0101rk\u0101pumu, saist\u012bb\u0101 ar autovad\u012bt\u0101ja instrukcijas p\u0101rk\u0101pumu. Atbild\u0113t\u0101js liet\u0101 p\u0101rk\u0101puma form\u0101lo esam\u012bbu ar\u012b nenoliedz. Taj\u0101 pa\u0161\u0101 laik\u0101, tiesas ieskat\u0101, darba dev\u0113js nav pietiekami izv\u0113rt\u0113jis \u0161\u012b p\u0101rk\u0101puma b\u016bt\u012bbu. Tiesa nevar objekt\u012bvi ap\u0161aub\u012bt atbild\u0113t\u0101ja paskaidrojumus, ka neapst\u0101\u0161an\u0101s pietur\u0101 iesp\u0113jams ir bijusi noteiktu notikumu sakrit\u012bba un nav bijusi apzin\u0101ta un speci\u0101la r\u012bc\u012bba. \u0160\u012b r\u012bc\u012bba nenoliedzami ir ietekm\u0113jusi pieturviet\u0101 eso\u0161o pasa\u017eieru intereses, tom\u0113r lemjot par sod\u012b\u0161anu, darba dev\u0113jam ir j\u0101izv\u0113rt\u0113 soda sam\u0113r\u012bgums. Nav zi\u0146u, ka atbild\u0113t\u0101js iepriek\u0161 ir disciplin\u0101ri sod\u012bts, savu vainu vi\u0146\u0161 atzinis un notiku\u0161o no\u017e\u0113lojis. Sam\u0113rojot p\u0101rk\u0101puma smagumu, negat\u012bv\u0101s sekas, darbinieka person\u012bbu un sniegto skaidrojumu par notiku\u0161o, tiesa nav guvusi p\u0101rliec\u012bbu, ka konkr\u0113t\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 darba l\u012bguma p\u0101rk\u0101pums ir tik b\u016btisks, lai izbeigtu darba tiesisk\u0101s attiec\u012bbas, bet bija iesp\u0113jams darbiniekam piem\u0113rot viegl\u0101ku disciplin\u0101rsodu izteikt piez\u012bmi vai r\u0101jienu. Tiesa ap\u0161auba, ka pras\u012bt\u0101js l\u012bdz\u012bg\u0101 situ\u0101cij\u0101 pret citu darbinieku b\u016btu izv\u0113l\u0113jies \u0161\u0101du sodu un konkr\u0113tais l\u0113mums attiec\u012bb\u0101 uz atbild\u0113t\u0101ju, visticam\u0101k, ir saist\u012bts ar vi\u0146a kritiskiem izteikumiem pret darba dev\u0113ju un vi\u0146a k\u0101 arodbiedr\u012bbas biedra r\u012bc\u012bbu.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2017. gada 21. decembr\u012b uz\u0146\u0113mums AS \u201cCATA\u201d, nesa\u0146emot arodbiedr\u012bbas piekri\u0161anu par darbinieka un arodbiedr\u012bbas LAKRS biedra M\u0101rti\u0146a Aizpurie\u0161a darba l\u012bguma uzteikumu, v\u0113rs\u0101s ties\u0101 par darba tiesisko attiec\u012bbu izbeig\u0161anu. Uz\u0146\u0113mums v\u0113l\u0113j\u0101s atbr\u012bvoties no darbinieka un akt\u012bva arodbiedr\u012bbas biedra, kur\u0161 \u0101rpus darba laika bija paudis kritisku, savu person\u012bgo viedokli par darba dev\u0113ja nesp\u0113ju nodro\u0161in\u0101t darbiniekiem cien\u012bgus darba [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jaunumi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lakrs.lv\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}